It is the task of the historian to write as "objectively" as possible. Is it a utopian ideal where we can never come to a conclusion and hence state that whatever findings we get are never conclusive? Nope, always take the initiative to solve the many obstacles in history writing even if it means that what you have come to conclude would be criticised by others. Take the trouble. Only through a learned discourse would we be able to further the knowledge of historiography. Keep working.
